
Tech Beat Intel vs AMD. Benq.
June 8, 2008Please note, for anyone damaged to settle upon between AMD and Intel. AMD chips run at a much lower clock speed, but still get things done faster. AMD names e.g. AMD 64 3500+ are designed to equate to what clock expedition an Intel sherd would be.
Thus the AMD 3500+ in my work computer, whilst uninterrupted at 2.2GHz is equivalent to a 3.5GHz Intel (at least!). AMD’s on board fragment memory controller was a breakthrough that Intel must be cursing about. An since AMD chips (since the 64 moment range started) are designed from the ground up to be able to be built duel core, I deliberate the next year or two will show us that Intel are having to catch up there as well! Tom August 3, 2006 08:56 AM Well, the best backing that I can give at the moment is to forfeit going to the X2 (AMD DualCore) because of the revitalized release that AMD has done on the amount of pins in the cpu, the new 940 rivet AM2 cpus have creamed all over any P4 processor, 3ghz and below core duo’s and the 939 stickpin 64bit AMD processors.


BenQ-Siemens